10 QUESTIONS THAT I WISH TO RAISE

10 QUESTIONS THAT I WISH TO RAISE

I have a few questions to ask. They are as follows :
1. Did Netaji actually manage to escape from Saigon and enter Russia? Or, was he assassinated prior to it in 1945 or 1946? If so, by whom and why?
2. Could he meet Stalin this time and get the asylum he sought?
3. Was Stalin hospitable to him or did he turn inimical on account of Netaji's earlier fascist association?
4. Did Netaji actually deliver three radio broadcasts from the Soviet Union on December 1945, January 1946 and February 1946? Are the texts of these broadcasts available?
5. Was the Soviet Union engaged in a secret intelligence-sharing pact with Britain? As per this pact did they hand over Netaji to British intelligence officers for third degree interrogation during the course of which he died?
6. Was Netaji held in a Siberian gulag and forced into labour in building the Road of Bones where in cold, malnourishment and exhaustion he died and was buried under ice over which the road kept on being built?
7. Was Netaji executed by the Khrushchev regime around 1957, a year after the 20th CPSU? Alexander Koleshnikov says that the post-Stalin Soviet dispensation did not have much use for him, so, they disposed him off. Is this credible?
8. If Netaji did escape from the Soviet Union, when and how did he do so?
9. What about Sarat Chandra Bose's assertion that his brother (Subhas) was in Red China in 1949, an assertion he flashed in his newspaper, 'The Nation'?
10. Did Sarat Chandra Bose receive any secret intimation from his brother Subhas on account of which he held his aforesaid notion about his presence in Communist China?

Written by Sugata Bose

P.S. : I request all to participate in helping me find the answers to my queries.

Sugata Bose Rajyashree Chaudhuri But the questions are necessary to raise as nothing is dead certain as such despite what you are saying. If things were as you suggest, why is it that researchers cannot face up to the Press and adequately answers the questions posed? There are dubious assertions quite often made which makes a mockery of the whole discussion. No wonder the official theory persists and will continue to do so till rationally things are placed before the world by scholars armed in rational rigour and not swayed by bits and pieces of uncorroborated 'evidence' of sorts. At any rate, this forum is meant for discussion of all theories and points of contention, and the disappearance issue being not resolved in any satisfactory way as of now, all questions will continue to be placed here and discussions held for clarification of conception of the common mass of humanity like us who do not, for a change, may I venture to say, indulge in imposing on others arbitrary assumptions based on fanciful imagination and misinterpretation of stray bits and pieces of information gleaned from archives which do not lend either substance to their fantastic claims nor coherence to their narrative. It is these 'researchers' who quite often mislead the masses with their sterile assumptions and not men like us who pose the right questions that are disconcerting for them but keep the rationality of the whole movement along the right track and prevent it from becoming the puerile pastime of people in the preliminary stage of rational development. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.