Monday 4 June 2018

COMMENTS : NETAJI MARRIAGE CONTROVERSY



Sugata Bose Devastating data. What do the protagonists of the Netaji marriage narrative have to say now?Sugata Bose Drjayanta Choudhuri, do you really wish the Almighty to forgive seemingly unforgivable sins? Would that not be in violation of the Law of Karma and a contravention of divine justice? Is Netaji nothing to this nation that the perpetrators of falsehood, terrible maligning of his unsullied character and destroyer, thereby, of the hopes and aspirations of hundreds of millions of people, should be so prayed for, for their redemption? Are you serious or are you simply by reverse sarcastic comment driving home the pertinent point of terrible perfidy?
Sugata Bose Bombshell after bombshell. Now where do things stand?

Sumit Chandra Marriage date in Wikipedia coming as 26th Dec 1937. Is there a document from Japan/ Singapore where he declared his marital status?

Sugata Bose Sumit, so far as I know, Netaji had never publicly articulated that he had ever married or had secret love alliance and issue. Thus, to aver that he had such secret relations, to me it seems almost a blasphemous suggestion and a rank aspersion cast on his unsullied character.

Sumit Chandra I read in a lecture in East Asia Netaji had said he had no child of his own and looked upon INA soldiers as his own children.This lecture is another validation post 1941.

Sugata Bose I have been given to understand that Netaji in that lecture had said that he had no son which protagonists of the 'wife-daughter narrative' interpret thereby by implication as leaving room for Netaji having fathered a daughter.

Sumit Chandra Did he use son or child? Do you know the exact wordings?

Sugata Bose Sumit, I have said that I have been told. I have never read the text of the speech. So, I cannot aver on it with certitude.

Sumit Chandra I 100% agree. I can't understand why his relatives are adamant on proving he was married.What do they gain out of it? How can they deny their Ranga kaka's own handwritten declaration of 1939?

Sugata Bose These are to be slowly revealed, I guess, for it seems there is more to it than meets the eye. Please go through all the posts of Drjayanta Choudhuri that I have shared today. They are all lined up or below this post. Startling revelations!

Sugata Bose My goodness! What a revelation! The Pandora's Box has been opened. What a devastating disclosure!

Sumit Chandra I had such thoughts too.

Sugata Bose Sumit, what thoughts?

Sumit Chandra That the child could be related to the family.

Sugata Bose Well, that will open up a whole set of perfidious propositions and possibilities.

Sugata Bose Kudos to the researcher who has brought these facts to the fore. Netaji is blessing you for this service rendered to the nation and for the upholding of truth.

Sugata Bose Why such a concerted attempt to marry off Netaji or bind him in 'love-bond'? Who benefits from such aspersion cast on the unsullied one?

Sugata Bose Drjayanta Choudhuri, your writing style is so lucid that even ignorant me can understand the complex issues centring the maligning of Netaji and the sidelining of him thus from the entire national discourse.

Sugata Bose Karma inevitably recoils on the doer. So, be careful what you do to Netaji in his absence.

Rajyashree Chaudhuri Miscreants will not listen to your warning.They will continue doing all the crime they have been doing since generations.

Sugata Bose Such are the compulsions of self-interest to which man subscribes, the preservation of one's own fold at the expense of the ideal.

No comments:

Post a Comment