IS BRANDING HINDUTVAVĀDIS EN MASSE AS FANATICS LIBERALLY LITERALLY JUSTIFIED?

IS BRANDING HINDUTVAVĀDIS EN MASSE AS FANATICS LIBERALLY LITERALLY JUSTIFIED?

Hindutvavādis are indiscriminately branded as hatemongers, fanatics, Islamophobes et al. But Hindutvavād has grown as reaction to Islamic oppression of well over a millennium which has ruined the Hindus and Sanatan culture and civilisation largely, killed between 80 and 100 million Hindus, molested mothers, sisters and daughters by the millions, sold them as slaves in the slave-markets of Arabia and even dismembered the motherland in 1947. Thereafter, the Islamic state of Pakistan has carried on unleashing jihādi violence against India for the last 77 years. Hindutva had to arise one day in due defence of the Hindus and it has. Calling Hindutvavādis fanatics is sweet amnesia by those labellers of the theological core content of Islam and its historical application upon the kafir from inception to this day, among which the 'mushrik' Hindu is deemed the most despicable and deserving death. Are Hindus then to forever remain fodder for fanatics bent upon their utter annihilation? I leave it to you to judge.

Written by Sugata Bose