🕉 ISLAM IN THE EYES OF A KAFIR ... 5

🕉 ISLAM IN THE EYES OF A KAFIR ... 5

The entire line of logic is flawed. There is simply no objective proof of a subjective experience and its acceptance or rejection depends entirely on faith which does not stand the test of reason, especially in light of the fact that prophetic experiences in the Abrahamic tradition are supposedly uniquely bestowed on specific persons which find no contemporary corroboration in others as such. Hence, the Abrahamic religions are purely based on extrarational assertions and cannot ever be rationally validated. However, this does not mean that religion should not stand the test of reason. Vedanta stands it to good effect but Islam and Christianity fail to do so miserably. My point is that it is pointless proving Islam's this facet or that facet wrong by quoting verses from the Islamic scriptures when these very scriptures are in essence questionable in terms of their arbitrary and irrational archaic assertions. To that end Wasim Rizvi's arguments are accurate for he questions the very foundational validity of Islam. 🕉 

Written by Sugata Bose