THOSE THAT INDISCRIMINATELY CRITICISE BHAGAVANJI'S FOLLOWERS ARE THE ONES THAT ARE LEAST DEVOTED TO NETAJI DESPITE THEIR BONDED CONNECTIONS, PIOUS PRETENSIONS OR VEHEMENT VERBAL VITRIOL IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN

THOSE THAT INDISCRIMINATELY CRITICISE BHAGAVANJI'S FOLLOWERS ARE THE ONES THAT ARE LEAST DEVOTED TO NETAJI DESPITE THEIR BONDED CONNECTIONS, PIOUS PRETENSIONS OR VEHEMENT VERBAL VITRIOL IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN

And this must be remembered by all, including the ones who object to such use of Netaji for political gains or gains otherwise. They in turn ought not to deliberately or inadvertently resort to a like use. Character must be exhibited by all such who are votaries of Netaji this way or that. One sees a lot of tall talk in his name by people who have vested interests and tend to propagate Netaji to serve self-interest. And it is these ones who are usually the carping critics of those who have laboured lifelong to unravel the Netaji disappearance mystery, lived arduous lives full of self-sacrifice and service, men and women of exemplary character and attributes who have devoted themselves to the venerable monk living incognito. It is easy to criticise these -- for words count for nothing and come easy to little men -- but difficult to approach the standards of moral excellence of these renunciates in the great cause of Subhas Chandra Bose-Netaji-Bhagavanji-Mahakaal. Hence, those that object most to the propagation of the disappearance narrative are the ones most culpable to the very offence they accuse these dedicated devotees of Netaji-Bhagavanji. Would it were that they were a fraction as devoted to him as the ones they criticise! Self-promotion need not assume the role of being the conscience of society as well, for the two are contradisposed and cannot coexist beyond verbal pretence.

Written by Sugata Bose