Wednesday 2 August 2017

AN ONGOING CONVERSATION

Rajyashree Chaudhuri This shouldnot be put up. Anita never a Bose but a Brigette ,Pfaff is not a daughter of India. It is cruelty on innocent Indian people and their soft mental base and broad hearts. Such snatching of advantage is heinous and devious. The pages of falsehood should never be part of any timeline. It is not narrow mindedness to oppose this false information. Such promotion of misleading information is SIN.


Sugata Bose Rajyashree Devi, all You Tube videos and Google posts are being put up by me to allow deliberation thereof. I take no sides nor have I any preferred stance in this matter. I merely wish that all sides should get a fair representation and do not feel that I am favouring one theory or the other. I am neutral absolutely in all these issues and I welcome your opposition to the post and the related issue as well. Recently, I was likewise asked as to why I had put up Dr. Madhusudan Pal's You Tube videos regarding Netaji's marriage controversy but I did not therefore desist from doing so for the same aforesaid reason. You will have to appreciate that a public page like this welcomes everybody to air their views and you, as I said, are absolutely welcome to yours. If I have thus sinned, may the retribution thereof be on my soul alone for I am entirely free of representation of any group or party but myself and solely myself.

Rajyashree Chaudhuri Sugata Bose your forum will turn into a gory battlefield then. Dr Pfaff , though a lady of good academic standard ,extremely non interfering in the matter of Netaji and Indians , is the "Shikhandi" for the Netaji opponents to fight Netaji followers, taking advantage of the ethics they usually have about fighting ladies.
Sugata Bose Rajyashree Devi, let it be then a battlefield gory. I do not mind it at all. I will continue to post all sorts of videos and write-ups pertaining to Netaji and leave them to members for their deliberations.


Rajyashree Chaudhuri Sugata Bose but the war might pierce your heart with the arrow of righteousness and make you feel guilty for sparing your sacred forum space to injustice, dishonour and blasphemy to the greatest SON OF GOD and Mother India who gave you the Freedom to live with a respectable identity. There was no referee in the Kurushektra War. All had to side with the RIGHT or the WRONG.

Sugata Bose Rajyashree Devi, so be it. Let righteousness overwhelm me even unto the truth which I desperately seek but am denied access to through ignorance. But democracy dictates that I must keep this forum as also all other fora that I run open to all the winds of influence in my bid to let truth shine thereon.


Rajyashree Chaudhuri TRUTH is elusive, invaluable, cosmic and cannot be trapped in a mortal method. It evades capture due to its elusive property. It is patient and awaits decades, centuries ,epochs ,for seekers who seek nothing but Truth. Thus the saints in the spiritual planes doesnot allow space to thoughts which contradict their search. With the mercy of Providence they get what they want. However liberty is yours. Use of liberty is also yours.But Time is not yours. Opportunity is not yours. It is granted by the Merciful. The War of Confusion,Pollution continues till the time you donot ward off pollutants and agents of confusion from your inner space.

Sugata Bose Rajyashree Devi, I wholly discard this esoteric interpretation of truth which is un-Vedantic to say the least, fretful and fearful of consequence and submissive to unseen powers which are totally in contradiction to what our scriptures as opposed to those of the Abrahamic ones preach. Hence, knowing myself to be a delusive entity as such and my Self as the ultimate Truth, I refuse to cower under pressure from any quarter and hold my ground careless of consequence, for no consequence binds the valorous one in his pursuit of truth save that of conviction in his divine Self and in none other.


Rajyashree Chaudhuri Vedas were written and interpretations were done by patrons of foreign rulers. What our spiritual disciplic succession narrates to us is more accurate than academic interpretation done by scholars patronized by rulers. However digression from the issue is not worthwhile. Crash- Ash- Marriage of Netaji is like welcoming him with garlands of Thorns- dung- boots. Do we all want that? Let the inhuman,insensitive,incentive-driven hawks say what they want. Why should Truth seekers want debate or clarity on such issues when it is settled beyond doubt that all Crash-Ash-marriage&Anita stories are false? However you are at liberty to do what you think is comfortable and right. I thought of venting my views as it hurts immensely when one sees such videos of an alleged daughter ,awaiting clarification.Are we daring to put the life history and intention of Netaji to the court of internal assessment and judgement within the wrap of our ego of academic achievement and flamboyance ?


Sugata Bose Ah! There you go wrong about the interpretation of the Sanatan Dharma that I talked of. I was referring, --- although, I did not explicitly articulate it --- to the interpretations given to the Hindu scriptures by Swami Vivekananda and none other. The Vedas, by the way, were revealed to the seers (rishis) of transcendental Truth from the depth of their Atman and, as such, are not to be understood as written texts. The writing followed much later of these sacred texts recorded in memory by the different schools of Vedic thought and passed on orally through successive generations of disciples till they eventually got recorded in script form for the first time. Talking about the derogatory address which you referred to, you forget that I equally highlight all such videos as well (N.B. Dr.Madhusudan Pal's) that categorically dismiss the marriage episode of Netaji. It is, therefore, regrettable that Rajyashree Devi, you choose to highlight this video alone to suit your diatribe and give vent to your vitriol thus.


Rajyashree Chaudhuri It is true that I am vitriolic when it comes to the issue of any mention of false information about Netaji Subhas. I donot regret it.I will continue to make enemies for this ,with pleasure, from the educated members of the upper class of our society and remain cornered for not siding with such glamorous information about Netaji. In today's world it is an in-thing to talk of child out of wedlock! Or , a secret marriage and a child out of that!!! It is definitely thrilling .But to impose someone else's fatherhood on Netaji Bose is debasing and criminal. I will commit a SIN if I donot vehemently oppose wherever seen ,even after knowing the actual truth of it all. So you will always face such unpopular comments from me if you tag me with any issues related to Marriage-daughter and Aircrash death of Netaji Bose Sugata Bose

Sugata Bose Rajyashree Devi, your opposition to my posts are as welcome as my posts that are to be in future irrespective of any stance adopted by you. I do not necessarily subscribe to the views presented in a video that I post from You Tube but rightfully reserve the right to do so, both of subscription and of posting, that is, being the administrator of this neutral page on Netaji's disappearance mystery where, to all intents and purposes, I am pledged to my conscience to uphold before the public at large all pertinent information regarding the same whether it pleases his so-called exclusive bunch of followers or not. I have in no way cast aspersion on Netaji's unimpeachable character nor can I ever dream of doing so and I find this extravagance of emotional outburst on your part both revealing and disturbing, the former because it lends credence to the conviction in me that Netaji is still alive in the hearts of my countrymen and disturbing because it pains me to see the decadence of Netaji devotees overtime. Those that had actually worked with Netaji even during the tumultuous days of the Second World War were so very civil in their discourse and never took undue liberties with language even in confrontation of the direst enemies during the frenzy of war. The passage of time ought to have taught our lessons better and ardent devotees of Netaji must surely not be grinding their axes the way the current crop of confrontationists do by way of so-called activism on behalf of their leader who happens to be our leader as well. Civility of discourse is the sine qua non in a democracy and it must always be remembered by devotees of a cause, however ardent their assumptions be, that incessant verbal heckling is more often than not counter-productive in the achievement of aspired ends. The ruination of Netaji's cause is at hand when civilisation is at its ebb as is amply evident these days of decadent trends and disproportionate diatribes levelled at fellow countrymen by ardent aspirants to national good. Netaji would have been ashamed of such harangue as we are right now engaged in, you in your so-called defence of Netaji's honour which I have in no way violated nor can ever do and I in my defence of democratic rights infringed upon by you when you so peremptorily direct me as to what I may or may not post in a group administered by me.

Rajyashree Chaudhuri Sugata Bose Netaji's elder brother who first documented that Netaji's Air crash is a lie ,had in writing claimed that the marriage story and daughter was a lie of Nehru and associates. When posts with daughter of India is captioned for a lady who never cared to be a deponent of any of the Inquiry commissions set up on her alleged father, lest the truth comes out ,the lady who chose to put up with the chief conspirator of her alleged father in her maiden visit to India , the lady who seemed more eager to declare him dead in aircrash and settle the ASH in a memorial,how can one ever entertain videos with captions Daughter of India ? Why she has a birth certificate without Netaji's name? Why does she have Brigette as her maiden title and not Bose. It is so funny that we behave like illiterates in spite of glaring documents which matter, say we are being lied. Such videos of falsehood can be put up but with a caption of clarity about the views of the one posting it. It is not a SIN to be married with children. But it is definitely a SIN to call an unmarried man with no fatherhood episode to be both married and a father. But again you are at liberty to do what pleases you and makes you feel fulfilled and satisfied.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnjdscLocIY&t=826s

No comments:

Post a Comment