IN RESPONSE TO ALL THOSE CAUSTIC COMMENTS THAT ARE MADE IN A HASTE TOO TERRIBLE FOR COMFORT BY OBSERVERS CASUAL WHO CARE NOT TO READ THE POST AFTER ALL

IN RESPONSE TO ALL THOSE CAUSTIC COMMENTS THAT ARE MADE IN A HASTE TOO TERRIBLE FOR COMFORT BY OBSERVERS CASUAL WHO CARE NOT TO READ THE POST AFTER ALL

Subhanjan Chakraborti, read the post properly before commenting. Your objection will dissolve on reading for the matter has been well amplified to the point of optimal satisfactory clarification. The very caption should have been a pointer, I suppose. But evidently you missed its intent.

This is the present day saga of hurried observation and hasty response, thereof, full of preconceptions that tantamount to nothing pertinent in regard to a post that ought to merit decent pondering before the spillover of comment.

Well, such is the unfortunate fate of universal journalism where expectations of moderation in observation or of restraint in response is, perhaps, a deal too dear for the proletariat to pay. Would it were otherwise ! But it cannot be so, for democracy decadent deems such mass degeneration its essential cultural component and history shall record it as democracy's invariable cultural consequence.

May good sense prevail despite the odds being heavily against the dawning of such sanity ! Vande Mataram !

Written by Sugata Bose

P.S. :

IN FURTHER RESPONSE

Oh, not at all, Subhanjan Chakraborti. I very well understand the drift of your thoughts but, for sure, find your observation hurried, unwarranted and, typically, a trifle out of place. I very well have understood the import of your comment as it generally is, a trifle slanted in a specific direction which is not often in harmony with the general intent of a post or its contextual content, and my response has been quite commensurate with it. At any rate, the proposition was Parashuram Purushottam's and I can hardly be held culpable for it. You should take up the matter on NETAJI group with him where the gentleman has made his observation. Then it will be a dialogue worth the salt between opposed ends, for nothing though, but opposed nonetheless.

Another point. The inability to view a write-up or an essay proper in its entirety and then making a pertinent response seems to be a modern malady much rampant. And it is this epidemic that is running riot on social media. Perhaps, these untoward, unwarranted observations do not deserve such honour of a counter-response except when the offensive is made often in a supercilious manner, much to the irritation of the author of a painstaking post. One wonders how far men go these days to make their presence felt, which is the flight of the self-bloated ego after all.