How were these two personalities (Lal Bahadur Shastri and Leela Roy) connected to the disappearance of Netaji? Enlighten us if you have knowledge about it please.
Leela Roy apparently had met Bhagawanji for almost a decade and accepted him as Netaji. She has, I have heard, written about the same in a letter. May we have the contents of this letter here please? Shall somebody oblige us with this service? That would prove crucial, even if not definitive, to the determination of the case, for Leela Roy's evidence is no throwaway piece of fantastic notion of a gullible mind but the considered judgement of a seasoned revolutionary used to the discrimination of underground revolutionary activity. Moreover, Leela Roy had seen both Netaji and Bhagawanji and, hence, she was in a far better position to judge than some others who have seen Bhagawanji but not Netaji in person.
Who was it that Lal Bahadur Shastri had apparently met in Tashkent (1966) about whom on his return home he would break the news to his countrymen that would 'make things alright'? The information was cremated with him. What an unnatural death, possibly by poisoning, at such a strikingly unnatural hour in his life! No postmortem done. Why? Who was / were behind this sudden demise / murder? Any connection to Netaji?
The 'Tashkent man' is reportedly wearing a wig. Hence, there are obvious differences in his appearance from that of Netaji. The Tashkent man is seen having thick black hair while Netaji's hair had highly receded and was greying. The difference in hair-spread has caused a marked difference in facial appearance to the discerning eye. However, forensic face-mapping done by British expert Neil Miller says otherwise. According to Miller, the two faces are an almost match of each other. Now, this is evidence scientific and no gullibility of the naked eye. Removing the wig from the Tashkent man's head apparently makes for identity with Netaji's face, so protagonists of this theory say. Now, what is the truth? I, for one, do not know for sure at any rate. I leave it to members for their reasoned deliberations.
Regarding the 'Paris man' it must be said that he has a great deal of facial similarity with that of Netaji and seems about roughly the same height and physical stature, although, he is much more sprightly and, apparently, less spiritual in mannerism. But the question arises --- this Paris Man is so youthful and Netaji by 1969 would have been 72 years old and definitely much more mellowed in his movements. Hence, the doubt arises and persists.
Regarding the 'Paris man' it must be said that he has a great deal of facial similarity with that of Netaji and seems about roughly the same height and physical stature, although, he is much more sprightly and, apparently, less spiritual in mannerism. But the question arises --- this Paris Man is so youthful and Netaji by 1969 would have been 72 years old and definitely much more mellowed in his movements. Hence, the doubt arises and persists.
No comments:
Post a Comment