Netaji is a much misunderstood man. Imagine how it feels to
be labelled ‘war criminal’ by your own countrymen for your efforts to free your
country from British bondage. And that is what he remains even after seven
decades since the Second World War in the records of the victorious Allies, a
label which no other self-respecting sovereign nation would have allowed
without making serious effort to erase such appellation.
America took help
from the French to gain liberation from the British in their War of
Independence. The French were the enemies of the British historically till the
First World War allied them against the Germans in a common war effort. Netaji
applied the same principle of the ‘enemy of the enemy being one’s friend’. He
found in the Axis Powers his friend against the British occupiers of India.
America ended the
Second World War by dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Was this
not a war crime of the worst order? Should then not President Harry Truman be
considered ‘war criminal’ for, after all, the nuking of the cities led to
unnecessary civilian deaths by the hundreds of thousands?
Churchill caused the death of five million Bengalis in the
man-made Bengal Famine of 1943 when crops were exported from Bengal to the
European War Front to be stocked as buffer for the soldiers fighting for the
British, in anticipation of future requirements. This was the worst genocide perpetrated
by the British under specific command from the evil Churchill. Should he not, therefore,
be called ‘war criminal’?
Reflect, friends, before you think you have done justice to
your motherland in any mean measure, before you practise your daily perfidies
of pious pleas and prayers to your partial Protector who you have permanently
purchased as your prime possession for the sake of self and familial priorities,
oblivious of the plight of the martyrs who bled that you be free today to
indulge in your daily indolence of deliberated dastardliness. Jai Hind!
No comments:
Post a Comment