WHITHER WORLD PEACE?
Radical religion is a major threat to world peace. Exclusive outfits proclaiming that they are the repositories of the sole truth of God and man are allowed to preach their radically perverted versions but if criticised for such hate-mongering, the liberal critics are pulled up on the dubious charge of attempting to create social unrest. Is this democracy? How can innocent civilians be allowed to be subjected to propagation of sectarian interpretations of religion when in every religion there are brighter elements to be preached? In a world divided horrendously along religious lines on account of radicalisation of politics by using the ruse of religion, how can peace obtain unless power-mongering using religion is replaced by saner policy-making and progressive people-oriented programmes? Moreover, what is the efficacy of adopting a policy of appeasement towards fanatics who subscribe neither to rhyme nor reason but follow archaic prescriptions, arbitrary and autocratic, for treatment of the maladies of the modern world?
Science is equally culpable for its snobbishness and assumed
superiority in being apparently the only way to approach the problem of
existence. The objective methodology is fine in so far as ascertaining the
physical laws of the universe but falls short when it comes to determining the
laws of the Being, of the subtler realities that escape the eye but are,
nonetheless, operative . The subjective method of investigating reality is as
much a valid method as the objective one and there ought to be no objection to
it so long as the investigation is done along rational lines as suits
psychology where the mind is the observer and the mind the observed. And as
subtler realities unfold before the purified vision, the introspection takes on
a finer form and its rationale also becomes redefined along inspirational
channels, never contradictory to the refined reason though, but eluding perhaps
the surface scientist with his equal bigotry of coarse reasoning and undue
demands for empirical evidence of a Reality transcendental.
The problem of radical politics has long been a scourge of
the world but when the same gets mixed with religion of an extreme kind it
assumes dangerous proportions threatening the security of humanity as a whole.
Radical religion is fundamentally a political movement and, therefore, shuns
inclusiveness, propagates exclusive political programmes in the name of divine
decree and allows only a narrow interpretation of truth as suits its earthly
objective so far removed from true spirituality that cares nothing for aught of
earth. Moreover, the simplistic fanatical formulations of such faiths coupled
with personality and its adoration easily catch the imagination of unformed
minds and so proliferate among the masses. So much for the much-vaunted theory
of conversions engineered world-wide on the basis of the exclusive possession
of the revealed truth of God when the reality is that enforced and enticed
procurement keeps bolstering the ranks of these radical outfits masquerading as
saving grace of the Lord.
The Vedanta in trumpet voice declares the divinity of man
and says nowhere, on the contrary, that a saviour or a prophet is necessary to
free the eternally free man. It affirms that the Self is eternally free and that
it is primeval ignorance that inexplicably covers up this knowledge, so to say,
to give apparent rise to the individual soul and, in the fullness of time,
knowledge dawns to dissolve this hallucination, the dream breaks and the Self
which all along shone unhindered, reveals itself again in resplendent glory.
The mind dissolves and with it the universe and its fictitious force and over-force
in the shape of an almighty God whose rise and fall are consonant with that of
phenomena.
This democracy of the human Spirit, this independence from a
slavish cringing before an almighty God who dispenses rewards and punishments
as per the whims of humans who conceive of Him and superstitiously assign Him
absolute powers over them, this liberation from a stupendous self-hypnosis and
consequent debasing of the human status before archaic assumptions is the soul
of Vedanta, the acme of spiritual evolution in ancient India. From the forests
retreats of India, from the high hills and the river valleys of this ancient
land have gone out messages of the divinity of the human soul and the clarion
call to all of humanity to shake off the delusion of this phenomenal world.
From India has sprung the eternal fountain of spiritual wisdom that has
inundated the world again and again, fertilising the soils of the different
climes and awakening the sleeping divinity of humanity. Civilisation across the
world owes its debt to the land of the Vedas for its humanising influence and
for the great spiritual culture that has gone out from there to the remotest
corners of the globe unobtrusively, spreading the fragrance of the life eternal
amidst this evanescent dream of the world. And once more the wave has arisen in
the form of Ramakrishna-Vivekananda bearing the ancient message of India, the
symphony of the soul, the grand harmony in our discordant world of dual dreams
and diabolic destruction of human hope where to survive with independence of
thought and action one has to be fortunate enough not to be born in a
theocratic State or in a dictatorial regime where prescriptions of irrational
faith and ideological indoctrination ruin the possibilities of poetical flights
of fancy along individual lines of self-development. Once more has the
individual asserted himself in India amidst the myriad maladies of the times,
once more has the voice of the Atman spoken, its music reverberating across the
hills and dales and sending a thrill through the nerves of humanity. Time it is
to wake up and respond to the call, else it will be a trifle too late, for the
forces of veritable evil, the intolerant, irrational ideologies of the world
are going to take over the control of our lives and what that will mean is
surely anybody’s guess---a return to the medieval dark ages.
Savage cultures of the past have had their time and it is
now time enough for civilised humanity to potently respond to the challenges of
the times instead of capitulating meekly to organised irrationality handed down
the ages in the guise of divinely inspired communication that must by force
seek to convert humanity en masse to its fold. Conversion on a global scale has
long been the mission of exclusive religions and cannot be condoned at any
rate. It has been in the past the seed of much violence for the victory march
of these proselytising exclusive religions has inevitably been at the cost of
the life-blood of the conquered cultures, often superior to the conqueror by
far and so, succumbing to the might of their brutal onslaught devoid of the
higher principles of piety they so vehemently seem to uphold as the essence of
their faiths. In a pluralistic world this exclusive existence of a monotheistic
faith can hardly be the prescription for peace and this attempt to thrust a
codified culture, decadent and dictatorial, archaic and arbitrary, onto a more
sophisticated civilisation is reprehensible. Unless humanity shifts from this
abject submission to divine dictatorship and takes control of its own destiny,
there is no hope for either progress or peace on a lasting basis. An unseen
arbiter of human affairs is a dangerous proposition for it is tantamount to the
abject surrender of human freedom and reasonableness to an imaginary deity who
is an unconstitutional authority dictating terms to deluded, hypnotised
humanity. Such surrender seems to be the essential clause of dualistic
religions and it breeds horrendous harm when subscribers to such faiths harbour
hatred towards those that do not belong to their denominations or when they
force their cult doctrines on people who are at variance with them. Such
exclusive and narrow conception of truth necessarily precipitates a fanatical
mass mentality and its concomitant evil, violence and holy war. Religion which
ought to foster fraternal feelings among men in effect divides humanity into
warring factions vying for political supremacy which is falsely termed
propagation of the faith. Gone is spirituality which is the core truth of every
religion and in its place dances the devil of delusion, diabolic, dark.
The only hope then is in breaking free from this dependence
on others for every little fulfilment of our needs and desires. We must strive
to be independent, not merely economically and socially but more so in the mind
for the fetters that bind us to this mortifying duality have their genesis
there and for us to be free citizens of the universe we have to shake off the
age-old delusion that the mind conjures. This is a tall order but we must begin
where we are stationed now, in our day-to-day deliberations in the thoroughfare
of life, in our struggle for survival amidst the myriad iniquities that
threaten to crush us and in the pursuit of our aspirations and dreams that
alone give a meaningful colour to our terrestrial existence. And everywhere we
must carve out our destiny as free men without leaning on any shoulder, as
free, self-supporting individuals with a ramrod straight spine and capable of
coordinated activity where interdependence is the rule but never mere one-sided
dependence. This will build self-respect and the capacity for self-sustenance which
is the primary requisite for character-building and a peaceful society in its
wake for society is but the aggregate of individuals and when individuals are
wise and peaceful, society is so as well.
Perhaps it all sounds very simplistic and naive and I
wholeheartedly endorse the view that the above-mentioned independence of spirit
will not immediately bring about breakthroughs in social consciousness but the
beginning will have been made. And from the simple seed planted in the heart of
humanity will in time to come grow the mighty banyan of knowledge spreading its
branches and afforesting the world with generations of seekers of truth who
will go afresh to Nature each time to read their own Book of Revelations seated
in the core of their consciousness, in the deepest recesses of their heart
where the sovereign Self is seated in resplendent glory. Inspiration shall then
be ever renewed and expression adjusted to the times to thwart decadence, a
fresh realisation and a fresher avowal of truth in the light of newer findings
in the objective world. Then the conflict between the two worlds of which man
is the interface will cease and with it will end all uncharitable feelings
between brothers wending their way towards the same goal. Such a harmony will
be possible as humanity progresses towards higher readings of Truth with the
advance of science in particular and of knowledge in general for the soul of
man may not be stifled for long nor his conscience stilled for good.
It was man that first discovered the truths of religion. It
was man to whom revelations were made. Revelation or otherwise, it has always
been man who has been at the centre-stage of things. To give priority to
revelation and inferior status to man who was the perceiver of such revelation
is, to borrow a religious term, blasphemous for without the perceiving system,
such revelation would have never existed. It will be impossible to prove the
independent existence of revealed truth beyond the cognition of some individual
who came back, so to say, to report it whether such truths are there or not. Likewise,
the existence of God is man-dependent and not the other way round in a sense
although, philosophically speaking, it depends on how terms are defined. It all
boils down to the simple fact that in the plane of human vibration, all
knowledge is based on sense perception and that which lies beyond the senses
may not be conveyed in linguistic terms or translated to the sensory mode.
Thus, no scripture can claim that it possesses the Ultimate Truth or that its
formulations accurately describe the inexpressible Truth which is
transcendental. Nor can any scripture be held inviolable for being the perfect
Word of God as scriptural revelation to any particular person is bound to be
coloured up by the person’s cultural background, evolutionary status and
circumstantial need. Neither can any religion claim exclusive possession of
Truth and that it is its final formulation for the Book of Life is an
ever-revealing text that brooks not such heresy but keeps on delivering afresh
the children of Light who read into it higher and higher meaning till the very
book falls and life itself is transcended. In scientific terms it is somewhat
akin to the breakdown of the laws of physics in the heart of a singularity.
Liberalism cannot overcome fanaticism through dialogue or
discussion for fanatical elements are conditioned into believing that the
liberal-minded are heretical elements who are devoid of character and therefore
do not subscribe to their codified dogma. So long as this sense of theocratic
self-glorification is there, meaningful dialogue is a far cry. This sense of
scriptural certitude which makes scepticism taboo is not conducive for
investigation into Reality nor is a superficial scepticism bound for any
reasonable understanding of Truth and this leaves the field open to diametrical
opposition between parties lacking in
sympathy for each other’s views. When a middle-ground is sought by those
that strive to bridge the distance created by this lack of appreciation of opposite
views of opposing parties, a dialogue is necessary. Even if the sceptics argue
on the basis of rational principles for they are willing to debate, it is
difficult to bring in the religious bigots to the discussion table for their
very dogmatism brooks no opposition in debate or deliberation and they rigidly
hold on to their bigoted stance and maintain their insular status. Such refusal
to communicate on a civilised basis with others who differ from them
ideologically keeps the lurking fear of the befalling of all that is the child
of fanaticism and the world has only to suffer for it. So, where is the chance
of peace?
Education is the panacea but even accomplished scientists
are bigoted in their beliefs and this is a strange revelation about the
multiple reference frames obtaining in the mind of a single person. No wonder
Walt Whitman had declared, “I contain multitudes.” This apparent dichotomy
within the mind of a man of science throws human society into sharp focus as
being a conglomeration of divergent beliefs which are so antithetical to each
other that civilised co-existence has become a challenge today and the outcome
of it all is violence, war, desecration and destruction and the endless
streaming of tears off innocent eyes who are neither privy to the policies of
politicians that trigger off war nor are they in control of their own destinies
which they have under circumstantial pressure surrendered to their malevolent
masters.
The prospects are bleak for peace now or in the near future.
But I am no doomsday prophet and hold firmly the belief that humanity will see
through this dark night of despair and desolation and the sun will rise on the
eastern horizon once more with a thousand-fold effulgence to carry civilisation
ahead till humankind will be one under the banner of the universal religion of
man which will be not a codified doctrinaire cult but an open book of the
divinity of all that exists, whose God is Man and whose holy book is the Book
of Life unfolding every moment, carrying all of phenomena towards the final
goal of liberation. Such a day indeed will come in the fullness of time when
man will have fought with brother man to satiation and, war-weary, will be
seeking salvation in peace.