1. Is terrorism the result of radicalisation or is it the result of discovery of theological facts as they are?
2. Maya covers up (Aavarani Shakti) and Maya deflects (Vikshep Shakti). Both these are being applied by apologists to defend indefensible theological positions which are bankrupt in philosophical content anyway.
3. Read more, like photographs less, for the text of an essay suffers from such apathetic attitude and the cause of propagation of the idea is, thus, thwarted as well.
4. We are no more free in a world bound by Islamic terror. Our rights to freedom of expression are severely curtailed and we remain mute spectators to the ghastly spectacle of innocence being bathed in blood. Whither humanity?
5. There can be no justification for the perpetration of terror even if so-called holy texts arbitrarily sanction such violence citing any supernatural or human authority. Life is to be valued above death and death cults cannot be permitted to assume preeminence in the thoroughfare of life even if they be the ardent adherents of some of the core teachings of major world religions. Life is sacrosanct and must be venerated as such.
No comments:
Post a Comment