Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose’s family was snooped on for 20 long years (1948-1968) by the Government of India and the West Bengal Government. Recent declassification of 64 Netaji Files by the West Bengal Government has confirmed this dastardly act, first brought to light by the earlier declassification of two of the Netaji Files by the Union Government. The question arises as to why this was done. What was the paranoid that prompted the Nehru Government to initiate this surveillance process and, thereafter, to persist with it for over two decades when the innocuous members of the Bose family were neither anti-nationals nor potential political threats to the ruling Congress Party either at the Centre or at the State? Why were the Intelligence Agencies tapping their telephone calls, opening their letters, following them wherever they went and constantly watching their activities? Were the Boses deemed dangerous on account of their kinship to Netaji? But, then, Netaji was dead since 18 August, 1945 according to the official Government version! Or, was he not? Should we then surmise that the Government of India was sceptical of its own propagated line that Netaji had died in a plane crash at Taihoku Airport in erstwhile Formosa and was apprehensive of his possible return to India on account of which it was consistently snooping on the Bose family round-the-clock for 20 years or so in the hope that the hero might contact his kith and kin someday which would offer the Government clue as to his whereabouts? If so, this was the most heinous offence against a family whose seminal contribution to the freedom struggle has few parallels for the brothers Bose had literally rocked up the foundation of the British Empire.
If snooping carried on till 1968, it meant that the
Government of India entertained the idea that Netaji was alive till then for
Sarat Chandra Bose was no more and, in absence, surely, posed no political
threat to the Congress Party in any way that would require such an elaborate
intelligence machinery to monitor his family’s movements. It was Netaji Subhas
Chandra Bose then that the Government was evidently trying to track down but,
perhaps, unsuccessfully. Finally, what was it that caused this surveillance to
stop abruptly in 1968? Had the Government finally given up or was there some other sinister motivation behind it which may be revealed only when all Secret Files on Netaji
are eventually declassified under enormous public pressure for it does not seem
that the Government will of its own volition do it in national interest as it
keeps on citing bogus reasons related to national security whenever it has to
defend its otherwise indefensible position regarding the Classified Netaji
Files?
The moot point remains, however. Was it in keeping with
democratic propriety when the Government headed by Jawaharlal Nehru proceeded
to surreptitiously monitor the movements of India’s premier freedom-fighting
family? Was this the price this leonine lineage of patriots had to pay for the
transfer of their political bondage? For what else was this sort of surveillance
tantamount to if not subservience to the other great family of India’s freedom
struggle, the Nehrus? If this was not breach of trust, pray, what else was? Is
this what they deserved at the hands of comrades-in-arms once in the freedom
struggle when the freedom had been won? A perfidy more pernicious than this has
scarce visited this land of purest dreams whose brightest star had been blighted
by the powers that be from the devious days of the Mahatma and his machinations
at Tripuri. Nehru is gone and gone is Gandhi. Indira Gandhi is gone as well,
the one that had subjected a nation to the ignominy of her version of ‘self-rule’
and not what Tilak had vouched for. Now who will answer for these terrible indiscretions
on the part of successive Congress Governments at the Centre and at the State?
Who may be held culpable for the offence that befits not a civilized society to
indulge in and, that too, from its premier Prime Minister whose ungentlemanly actions
hardly justify the appellation of the ‘gentle colossus’ ascribed him by a
biographer (refer: ‘The Gentle Colossus’ by Prof. Hiren Mukerjee)? Will the
present-day Congress Party rise above its sycophantic adulation of its leadership,
past and present, and for once show political maturity to rescue the Party from
being a personality cult, and, in so doing, pronounce its judgement on the
misdemeanours of its tallest figures, thereby, resurrecting the Party from its
age-old familial line? Or, is the personality cult so deeply embedded in its
functioning that it is well-nigh a settled fact that history will avenge its
manifold wrongs at the hands of this political organization by the obliteration
of its very existence? For no Party in a democracy may substantially subsist if
it is devoid of the collective will and the individual runs it autocratically
thrusting his/her will on the collection comprising it which in abject servitude
bows down to the will of the Chosen One. Now is the time for the Congress to
make amends for past misdeeds of its leaders and show a semblance of real love
for the nation and veneration for the family its governments have successively snooped
on in such an unceremonious manner that patriotism takes a beating at the
hands of blatant self-interest masquerading as national necessity.
No comments:
Post a Comment